Perbandingan Performa Metode Pohon Model Logistik dan Random Forest pada Pengklasifikasian Data

Authors

  • Purnama Sari Department of Statistics, IPB University, Indonesia
  • Kusman Sadik Department of Statistics, IPB University, Indonesia
  • Mulianto Raharjo Kementerian Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29244/xplore.v12i1.858

Keywords:

Dimension of data, LMT, missing data, multicollinearity, random forest

Abstract

Multicollinearity and missing data are two common problems in big data. Missing data could decrease the prediction accuracy. Logistic model tree (LMT) is used to handle multicollinearity because multicollinearity does not affect the decision tree. Random forest can be used to decrease variance in prediction case. This study aimed to study the comparison of two methods, LMT and random forest, in multicollinearity and missing data in various cases using simulation study and real data as dataset. Evaluation model is based on classification accuracy and AUC measurement. The result stated that random forest had better performance if the multicollinearity level is moderate. LMT with omitted missing data is proven to have better performance for big data and when a high percentage of missing data occurred, and the multicollinearity level is severe. The next step is analysed real data with different sample size. The result stated that random forest have better performance. Omitted missing data have better performance in classification “breast cancer†data which consist 0,3 % missing data.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-15

How to Cite

Purnama Sari, Sadik, K., & Mulianto Raharjo. (2023). Perbandingan Performa Metode Pohon Model Logistik dan Random Forest pada Pengklasifikasian Data. Xplore: Journal of Statistics, 12(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.29244/xplore.v12i1.858

Most read articles by the same author(s)